Native vs Bazel Toolchains

Understanding how Bazel interacts with native toolchains is crucial for making informed decisions about build system architecture. This guide explores the relationship between Bazel and language-native build tools.

Core Concepts

What is a Native Toolchain?

• Language-specific build tools (go build, cargo, npm)
• Package managers (go mod, cargo, npm/yarn)
• Development tools (formatters, linters, LSP servers)

Bazel's Role

• Orchestrates native toolchains
• Provides hermetic build environment
• Manages cross-language dependencies
• Ensures reproducible builds

Go Ecosystem

go mod vs Bazel

• go mod:

  • Native dependency management
  • Simple, straightforward workflow
  • Integrated with Go tooling
  • Fast development iterations

• Bazel + Gazelle:

  • More complex setup
  • Hermetic builds
  • Cross-language support
  • Better monorepo support

Gazelle's Role

• Bridges go.mod and Bazel worlds
• Generates BUILD files from Go code
• Manages proto generation
• Handles external dependencies

Common Challenges

1. Adding Dependencies

   # go mod workflow
   go get github.com/example/pkg
   
   # Bazel workflow
   go get github.com/example/pkg
   bazel run //:gazelle-update-repos
   bazel run //:gazelle

2. Development Tools

   • gopls expects go.mod
   • Some tools need GOPATH/module setup
   • IDE integration complexities

JavaScript/TypeScript Ecosystem

npm/yarn vs Bazel

• npm/yarn:

  • Vast package ecosystem
  • Simple dependency management
  • Fast development workflow
  • Native TypeScript support

• Bazel:

  • Fine-grained caching
  • Hermetic builds
  • Better monorepo support
  • Cross-language integration

Build Tool Complexity

1. Multiple Compilers

   • TypeScript (tsc)
   • Babel
   • SWC
   • esbuild

2. Bundlers

   • webpack
   • Rollup
   • Parcel
   • Vite

Integration Strategies

1. Pure Bazel

   • Use Bazel rules for everything
   • Better hermeticity
   • Slower development cycle

2. Hybrid Approach

   • Use npm/yarn for development
   • Use Bazel for production builds
   • Compromise on hermeticity

Rust Ecosystem

Cargo vs Bazel

• Cargo:

  • Native Rust package manager
  • Excellent development experience
  • Integrated testing and benchmarking
  • Simple dependency management

• Bazel + cargo-raze:

  • Cross-language support
  • Better monorepo support
  • Hermetic builds
  • More complex setup

Integration Points

1. cargo-raze

   • Generates Bazel rules from Cargo.toml
   • Manages external dependencies
   • Maintains compatibility

2. Development Workflow

   # Update dependencies
   cargo add some-crate
   cargo raze
   bazel build //...

Performance Implications

Development Mode

1. Native Toolchains

   • Faster iteration cycles
   • Immediate feedback
   • Better IDE integration

2. Bazel

   • Initial build overhead
   • Caching benefits
   • Remote execution potential

Production Builds

1. Native Toolchains

   • Simple configuration
   • Platform-specific quirks
   • Less predictable

2. Bazel

   • Consistent results
   • Cross-platform support
   • Better caching

Making It Work Together

Best Practices

1. Keep Both Worlds in Sync

   • Maintain native manifests (go.mod, package.json)
   • Use generation tools (Gazelle, cargo-raze)
   • Regular synchronization

2. Development Workflow

   • Use native tools for quick iterations
   • Use Bazel for CI/CD
   • Maintain hermetic guarantees

3. IDE Integration

   • Configure language servers properly
   • Use Bazel-aware IDE plugins
   • Set up development shortcuts

Common Patterns

1. Development Mode

   # Quick iteration cycle
   go test ./...
   cargo check
   npm run dev
   
   # Verify Bazel build
   bazel build //...

2. CI/CD Mode

   # Full hermetic build
   bazel build //...
   bazel test //...

Conclusion

The choice between native toolchains and Bazel isn't binary. Most successful projects find a balance that works for their specific needs:

1. Use Native Toolchains For:

   • Rapid development
   • Simple projects
   • Developer tooling
   • Quick experiments

2. Use Bazel For:

   • Production builds
   • Cross-language projects
   • Large scale development
   • CI/CD pipelines

The key is finding the right balance for your project's needs while maintaining productivity and build reliability.